Tabular Comparison of Bitbucket, GitHub, and GitLab

Feature	Bitbucket	GitHub	GitLab
Hosting Options	Cloud, On-premises	Cloud, On-premises	Cloud, On-premises
Integrations	Integrates with Atlassian tools (Jira, Confluence, etc.)	Extensive third-party integrations	All-in-one DevOps platform with built-in features
Community	Smaller community compared to GitHub	Largest community, especially for open-source projects	Active community, especially for DevOps practices
Code Review	Supports pull requests, inline comments, code review workflow	Robust code review tools, pull requests, inline comments	Code review tools, merge requests, inline comments
CI/CD	Built-in CI/CD with Bitbucket Pipelines	GitHub Actions provides CI/CD capabilities	GitLab CI/CD offers extensive automation
Security	Granular access controls, integrates with Atlassian Access for advanced security features	Offers security advisories, dependency scanning, and code scanning	Built-in security features like static code analysis, container scanning
Pricing	Free for small teams, paid plans for advanced features	Free for public repositories, paid plans for private repositories and advanced features	Free for public and private repositories, paid plans for advanced features
Scalability	Scales well for small to medium-sized teams	Scales well for projects of all sizes	Scalable architecture suitable for large-scale projects
Ecosystem	Integrated with Atlassian ecosystem (Jira, Confluence, etc.)	Extensive third-party integrations and ecosystem	All-in-one platform with built-in features for DevOps
Documentation	Well-documented with support from Atlassian	Extensive documentation and community support	Comprehensive documentation and community resources

This table provides a concise overview of the key features and differences between Bitbucket, GitHub, and GitLab. Depending on your team's specific requirements and preferences, one of these platforms may be better suited for your development workflow.